Menu

News Categories

Quick Links

U.S. News

EPA Terminates $20 Billion in Biden-Era Climate Grants

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has officially terminated $20 billion in federal climate grants issued under the Biden administration’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, commonly known as the “green bank.” The decision, announced by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, follows a prior freeze on the funds and has sparked significant legal and political controversy. EPA Cites Oversight Concerns and Risk Zeldin, who assumed his role in late January, described the grants as part of a scheme with potential conflicts of interest and inadequate government oversight. “Twenty billion of your tax dollars were parked at an outside financial institution, in a deliberate effort to limit government oversight—doling out your money through just eight pass-through, politically connected, unqualified, and in some cases, brand-new nonprofit organizations,” Zeldin stated in a video released Tuesday night. He justified the termination by emphasizing the agency’s responsibility to prevent waste and ensure lawful allocation of funds. According to Zeldin, the decision aligns with the intent of existing laws, which require strict oversight of federal funding. Legal Challenges from Affected Nonprofits The decision has prompted lawsuits from three nonprofit organizations—Climate United Fund, the Coalition for Green Capital, and Power Forward Communities. These groups, which were among the eight selected to administer the grants, argue that the EPA’s actions violate their contractual rights and jeopardize critical climate initiatives. Climate United Fund has claimed that the EPA, in collaboration with Citibank, unlawfully denied it access to $7 billion designated for clean energy investments. The Coalition for Green Capital and Power Forward Communities have similarly accused the bank of improperly freezing an additional $7 billion intended to finance clean energy and environmental justice projects. A federal court hearing on one of the lawsuits is scheduled for Wednesday, where plaintiffs seek to overturn the funding freeze and reinstate access to the grants. Political Divide Over Green Bank Funding The green bank initiative, established in 2022 through the Inflation Reduction Act, aimed to fund projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote clean energy adoption. While congressional Democrats have lauded the program as a necessary tool to address climate change and create jobs, Republican lawmakers have frequently criticized it as a “slush fund” with insufficient accountability. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), a leading Democrat on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, condemned Zeldin’s decision, asserting that it lacked legal justification. “Without a shred of evidence, Administrator Zeldin is escalating his unfounded attempts to unilaterally terminate congressionally authorized and contractually obligated funding that would lower household energy costs, spur economic growth, and cut pollution,” Whitehouse stated. Ongoing Investigations and Future Implications The controversy extends beyond the EPA, as the Department of Justice and FBI have reportedly launched investigations into the administration of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. Whitehouse, however, has criticized these investigations as politically motivated attempts to justify the grant terminations. The Biden administration’s green bank program had planned to distribute funds to tens of thousands of clean energy projects nationwide. With the termination, the future of these initiatives remains uncertain, as both legal battles and potential congressional actions could determine the fate of the allocated funds. Key Takeaways: The EPA, under Administrator Lee Zeldin, has terminated $20 billion in climate grants issued during the Biden administration, citing oversight and fraud concerns. Three nonprofit organizations that were awarded funding have filed lawsuits challenging the decision, arguing that the freeze is unlawful. The move has intensified partisan divisions, with Democrats calling it an attack on climate initiatives and Republicans defending it as necessary financial oversight. A federal court hearing is scheduled to address the legal challenges from affected organizations. The Justice Department and FBI are investigating the handling of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, though Democrats claim these efforts are politically driven. The termination of the grants marks a significant shift in federal climate policy, setting the stage for ongoing legal and legislative battles over the future of clean energy funding in the U.S.

Read full article
U.S. News

U.S. Stock Market Faces Volatility Amid New Trade Tensions with Canada

The U.S. stock market experienced sharp declines this week as investors reacted to renewed trade tensions between the United States and Canada. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell nearly 600 points on Tuesday after suffering an 890-point loss the previous day. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq also saw declines, continuing a trend of market volatility that has raised concerns among analysts about potential economic slowdowns. Trade Policies Impacting Market Confidence The market downturn coincided with new trade measures introduced by the U.S. administration. President Donald Trump announced an additional 25% tariff on Canadian aluminum and steel imports, escalating trade friction between the two neighboring countries. In response, Ontario Premier Doug Ford suspended the province’s 25% surcharge on electricity exports to the U.S., signaling Canada’s willingness to adjust its trade policies in response to American measures. Economists and financial analysts have pointed to these trade policies as key factors contributing to investor uncertainty. Citigroup downgraded its outlook on U.S. stocks from “overweight” to “neutral,” citing concerns over weaker economic data, potential job market contractions, and overall uncertainty surrounding tariffs. Market Reactions and Economic Outlook The impact of the trade policies has been reflected across various sectors. The Nasdaq Composite, which saw a 4% drop on Monday, faced additional pressure due to declines in major technology stocks. Analysts at HSBC Holdings also revised their outlook on U.S. equities to “neutral,” highlighting better investment opportunities in global markets. The administration has framed these trade actions as part of a broader economic strategy aimed at strengthening domestic manufacturing. President Trump defended the tariffs, stating in an interview that they were necessary to ensure a more self-sufficient economy. He downplayed stock market fluctuations, emphasizing the long-term benefits of his administration’s trade agenda. However, corporate leaders have expressed concerns about the effects of these policies. Delta Air Lines revised its first-quarter earnings forecast downward, attributing the adjustment to a slowdown in business travel and consumer spending trends. CEO Ed Bastian noted that economic uncertainty has influenced corporate decision-making, leading to more cautious spending by businesses. Investor Sentiment and Economic Strategy Shifts Financial experts have noted that the recent market downturn is part of a broader shift in investor sentiment. Over the past year, U.S. policymakers have focused on maintaining economic growth while managing inflation. However, recent signals from the administration suggest a willingness to accept short-term economic disruptions in pursuit of long-term policy goals. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated last week that a market “reset” might be inevitable after years of steady expansion. While stock markets surged following Trump’s election in November, investor enthusiasm has waned as the full implications of new trade policies become clearer. Analysts caution that further economic turbulence could follow if uncertainties around tariffs and trade agreements persist. Global and Domestic Economic Factors Beyond trade concerns, other economic indicators have contributed to market unease. Goldman Sachs has revised its 12-month recession probability from 15% to 20%, reflecting concerns about economic slowdowns. At the same time, layoffs in various industries, slowing consumer confidence, and inflationary pressures have added to the uncertainty. The coming weeks will be critical in determining the market’s trajectory, with key economic data releases, including inflation reports, expected to provide further insights. Investors will be closely watching how trade negotiations between the U.S. and Canada evolve, as well as the administration’s next steps in managing economic policy. For now, analysts suggest that market volatility will likely persist as investors weigh the implications of trade tensions and shifting government strategies.

Read full article
U.S. News

Washington Post Editor Resigns Over Editorial Policy Dispute

In a dramatic shake-up at one of the most respected news institutions in the country, longtime Washington Post columnist and associate editor Ruth Marcus has stepped down, citing a fundamental shift in editorial independence. Her resignation follows accusations that the newspaper’s CEO and publisher blocked her column, which challenged a new directive from owner Jeff Bezos. Marcus, who has been a part of The Washington Post since 1984, expressed deep concern over what she described as an erosion of independent judgment within the paper’s opinion section. In a letter addressed to Bezos and CEO William Lewis, she warned that the new editorial policies could undermine public trust by limiting columnists’ ability to express their genuine opinions. The controversy began after Bezos announced a bold new direction for the Post’s opinion section, instructing it to consistently advocate for personal liberties and free markets. Marcus, believing this directive to be restrictive, penned a column that respectfully challenged the mandate. However, Lewis ultimately decided not to publish her piece—a move Marcus says was unprecedented in her nearly two decades as a columnist. “Wills' decision to not run my column underscores a dangerous shift,” Marcus wrote in her resignation letter. “Columnists have long had the freedom to choose their topics and express their viewpoints. That autonomy is now at risk.” Her resignation follows that of opinion editor David Shipley, who also left the paper in response to the new policy direction. The shift has been widely interpreted as an effort to align with political and business interests, particularly after Bezos and other high-profile tech figures attended the presidential inauguration earlier this year. Despite her disappointment, Marcus expressed gratitude for her colleagues and the institution that had been her professional home for four decades. “I love The Post,” she wrote. “It breaks my heart to leave, but I must. I have the deepest admiration for my colleagues and will miss them every day.” The Washington Post acknowledged her departure, thanking Marcus for her contributions over the years. As the paper navigates this significant internal shift, questions remain about the future of its editorial independence and the implications for journalistic freedom.

Read full article
U.S. News

New Trump puts new limits on Elon Musk

President Donald Trump convened his Cabinet in person on Thursday to deliver a message: You’re in charge of your departments, not Elon Musk. According to two administration officials, Trump told top members of his administration that Musk was empowered to make recommendations to the departments but not to issue unilateral decisions on staffing and policy. Musk was also in the room. The meeting followed a series of mass firings and threats to government workers from the billionaire Tesla founder, who helms the Department of Government Efficiency, that created broad uncertainty across the federal government and its workforce. DOGE’s actions have faced ferocious resistance in court and criticism from Democratic lawmakers and some Republicans. The president’s message represents the first significant move to narrow Musk’s mandate. According to Trump’s new guidance, DOGE and its staff should play an advisory role — but Cabinet secretaries should make final decisions on personnel, policy and the pacing of implementation. Musk joined the conversation and indicated he was on board with Trump’s directive. According to one person familiar with the meeting, Musk acknowledged that DOGE had made some missteps — a message he shared earlier this week with members of Congress. Trump stressed that he wants to keep good people in government and not to eject capable federal workers en masse. But his administration has in recent weeks fired tens of thousands of federal workers across numerous agencies in a series of blanket terminations. A federal judge and the chair of a federal civil service board have both concluded that the terminations were not tied to performance issues — and may have violated civil service laws. It is unclear whether the new guidance will result in laid off workers getting rehired. Trump posted about the meeting on Truth Social after this story posted, promising to hold similar meetings every two weeks. “As the Secretaries learn about, and understand, the people working for the various Departments, they can be very precise as to who will remain, and who will go,” he wrote. “We say the ‘scalpel’ rather than the ‘hatchet.’ The combination of them, Elon, DOGE, and other great people will be able to do things at a historic level.” The president later told reporters he wants Cabinet members to “keep all the people you want, everybody that you need.” But he also said he wanted cuts, and that Musk would remain a power center: “If they can cut, it’s better. And if they don’t cut, then Elon will do the cutting.” Musk later retweeted a Trump post and called it a “very productive meeting.” The timing of the meeting was influenced by recent comments from Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), who said on CNN Tuesday that Cabinet secretaries should retain the full power to hire and fire, according to one official. The official said Trump has been flooded with similar concerns from other lawmakers and Cabinet secretaries. The president’s admonition to agency heads could impact mounting legal scrutiny facing DOGE. Judges have increasingly expressed frustration and bewilderment at the Trump administration’s inability to explain who is in charge of the bureaucracy-culling effort and whether Musk himself is playing any role in ordering up the steep cuts to programs and jobs. Complicating the matter further, Trump declared during his address to Congress Tuesday that Musk is indeed the “head” of DOGE, a label that immediately reverberated in several of the Musk-focused court cases. Trump’s assertion conflicted with the White House’s representation in court last month that Musk had no independent authority to make policy decisions. Judges will now have to decide whether Trump’s after-the-fact characterization of Musk’s role resolves the already-existing legal challenges to DOGE’s work. It comes just as some of those lawsuits reach a new fact-finding phase that could produce more clarity on the SpaceX boss’ involvement in running the government. A federal judge last week ordered sworn testimony from some DOGE officials and affiliates to more fully understand the group’s work. And two lawsuits aimed at stopping Musk himself — one in Washington, D.C., and one in Maryland — are reaching crucial milestones as well. Those lawsuits allege that Musk has been exercising an unconstitutional degree of power for a government official who has not been confirmed by the Senate.

Read full article
World News

Trump expands exemptions from Canada and Mexico tariffs

US President Donald Trump has signed orders significantly expanding the goods exempted from his new tariffs on Canada and Mexico. It is the second time in two days that Trump has rolled back his taxes on imports from America's two biggest trade partners, measures that have raised uncertainty for businesses and worried financial markets. On Wednesday he said he would temporarily spare carmakers from 25% import taxes just a day after they came into effect. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum thanked Trump for the move, while Canada's finance minister said the country would in turn hold off on its threatened second round of retaliatory tariffs on US products. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said on Thursday morning he had had a "colourful" conversation about tariffs in a phone call with Trump. The US president used profane language more than once during Wednesday's heated exchange, according to US and Canadian media reports. It's so far so good for Mexico's Sheinbaum Trudeau told reporters that a trade war between the two allies was likely for the foreseeable future, despite some targeted relief. "Our goal remains to get these tariffs, all tariffs removed," he said. A first round of Canadian retaliation targeting C$30bn ($21bn, £16bn) of US goods is already in effect. The trade war tensions have rattled markets and raised fears of economic turbulence. On Thursday afternoon, the leading US stock indexes were all lower, with the S&P 500, which tracks 500 of the biggest American companies, ending down nearly 1.8%. In signing the orders, Trump dismissed the suggestion that he was walking back the measures because of concerns about the stock market. "Nothing to do with the market," Trump said. "I'm not even looking at the market, because long term, the United States will be very strong with what's happening." The carveout from the duties applies to goods shipped under North America's free trade pact, the US-Mexico-Canada agreement (USMCA) , which Trump signed during his first term. A White House official said about 50% of US imports from Mexico and 62% from Canada may still face tariffs. Those proportions could change as firms change their practices in response to the order. The White House has also continued to promote its plans for other tariffs, promising action on 2 April, when officials have said they will unveil recommendations for tailored, "reciprocal" trade duties on countries around the world. Trump said he agreed to grant the exemptions until 2 April after a phone call with Sheinbaum and they were aimed at helping carmakers and parts suppliers. The measures also reduced tariffs on potash - a key ingredient for fertiliser needed by US farmers - from 25% to 10%. Sheinbaum said on Thursday that she had had an "excellent and respectful" call with Trump, adding that the two countries would work together to stem the flow of the opioid fentanyl from Mexico into the US and curb the trafficking of guns going the other way. 'Numbskull' Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who leads Canada's most populous province, said afterwards that "a pause on some tariffs means nothing". Earlier, as relief looked likely but before it was announced, he told CNN that the province still planned to go ahead with a 25% tariff on the electricity it provides to 1.5 million homes and businesses in New York, Michigan and Minnesota from Monday. "Honestly, it really bothers me. We have to do this, but I don't want to do this," he said. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Thursday dismissed retaliation as counter-productive for trade negotiations. "If you want to be a numbskull like Justin Trudeau and say, 'Oh we're going to do this', then tariffs are probably going to go up," he said during a question-and-answer session after a speech at the Economic Club of New York on Thursday. Goods worth billions cross the borders of the US, Canada and Mexico each day and the economies of the three countries are deeply integrated after decades of free trade. Trump has argued introducing tariffs will protect American industry and boost manufacturing. However, many economists say tariffs could lead to prices rising for consumers in the US, while warning they could trigger severe economic downturns in Mexico and Canada. About $1bn in trade enters the US from Mexico and Canada each day that does not claim duty-free exemptions under USMCA, since it has historically enjoyed low or no tariffs, said Daniel Anthony, president of Trade Partnership Worldwide. "Whether importers can or will start claiming USMCA remains to be seen, but it's a huge amount of money at stake," he said. In the US, the economy is already starting to show the effects of the disruption from Trump's policies. Imports spiked in January on the back of tariff fears, with America's trade deficit increasing 34% to more than $130bn (£100bn), the Commerce Department reported.

Read full article